That also means that all 48 widgets from 123 Muse are now available for purchase (or if you are a member, download). Sneak Peek Donation Tracker 1.0. I got inspired over the weekend and created this really cool donation tracking tool that can be fully edited by your client using In-Browser Editing.
See more ideas about adobe muse, muse widgets, muse.Still, I hope that the Enlightenment developers wouldn’t (seem to) be so much into technology for technology’s sake only, and eycandy (moving desktop wallpapers? big deal… I really have better uses for my CPU and RAM) but that they would concentrate especially on things that actually improve usability and productivity.The point is: people need to actually use their desktops, not just admire how kewl some screenshots look like. To edit this template with Adobe Muse is very easy You can change colors, texts or replace the images in a few minutes.The template comes with a gallery slider widget and testimonials tabbed panel.Explore MuseFree.com Themes & Widgets's board 'Adobe Muse Free Themes', followed by 206 people on Pinterest. Maybe also other projects could indeed use some of the code and/or ideas and cooperate with the E team? (Also E could try to borrow, for example, the GNOME HIG guidelines, no.?)It is a modern and clean Adobe Muse template designed for Creative, Photography, Landing, Agency or other purpose. Video.Yes, E17 may have lots of potential with all its advanced technologies. MOVE for Muse is now Available Advanced Animation Widgets by Muse Resources.
Best of luck to Rasterman and the rest of the E crew too.To my sense, enlightenment has always been ahead of its time when it comes to eye candy stuff. Now if E17 could combine its innovative technology with the great GNOME usability guidelines but having much lower resource requirements (than GNOME/KDE), that could be something.Anyway, I’m sure to give E17 a try when it will get more stable. However, I never liked using E(16).And yes, all windows managers, how ever odd, have fans that claim that just that WM is the most usable and productive of them all, but whether that is true or not from an objective usability (testing) point of view is another thing…There’s a reason why people use GNOME and KDE more than other *nix WMs and desktops – despite KDE and GNOME being a bit resource hogs.
The only difference is that rasterman is right: he implements and tests things, but the other DE don’t event look at what he is doing. I mean… I remember I had a window manager’s theme that shaped my windows like dragons flying around the windows… and that was on my 486! sure that thing didn’t move and crashed often… but damn that was cool for the girls… oh wait, I did not have a girl 🙁To me, enlightenment is to desktop graphics what Nasa’s Dryden Flight Research Center is to aeronautics: an extraordinary test bed for what is going to happen in the future. This is coded by geeks for geeks IMHO.
All I can say after installing a cvs snapshot of e17 & the EFL is ‘wow this is going to f***ing rock’ although I’d recommend waiting for a proper release before trying as its not at least polished (yet still impressive to see). That should be the power of OSS, we can afford peoples coding for their pleasure… IMHOI was wondering when raster would post something like this after some of those gnome/freedesktop.org related blogs. Up to the others DE to take what’s good and reject what’s not. ALL today’s widgets aren’t implementing themeing systems only for the pleasure to code… E had that _long_ before anyother else.No, I wouldn’t like rasterman concentrating on better UI or better compatibility or even stabilize his thing if he don’t want… I would like him doing what he seems like to do: code incredible graphic things. Anyone reading osnews should know that now… IMHO.
By streamlining or performing tasks these subsystems do inefficiently, Evas can, most often, boost performance. This means it provides abstractions that allow it to work on top of (not as a replacement for) a generalized graphical subsystem, such as X11, DirectFB, or OpenGL. If I were to make a judgement based upon the content of their development digests, I would say fanatically thought out.Evas is designed to be a cross-platform canvas. I hope the other projects can leverage this already powerful set of libraries if they can rather than waste time making something thats already been done and could be used.If any e17 devs are reading this I must say keep up the fantastic workI just wanted to point out a few things to all the nay-sayers and uninformed and unqualified mouths hanging around here.The technology involved in Evas, EFL, and E17 have been thoroughly thought out. I do wonder however as I understand why gnome/kde and etc do not have such visual features in their toolkits (as obviously they are older and more mature and alot more stuff that usually goes in) I do understand rasters approach in his blog being the kinda rogue ‘have their fingers been up their ass’s’ kinda approach to the situation as they didn’t even mention e17 implying that they are pushing the boundarys.
Kind of like the concept of network filesystems. So, expect there to be improvements and issues, but don’t let that take away from marvelling at the quality and forethought put into the software to begin with.What’s the point of the blog post? From my understanding of it, rasterman is saying that there are two camps that have agreed on similar approaches to certain things. E developers are producing quality technology, much of which is first generation. Don’t think for a minute that these issues weren’t addressed and considered at length during the long development period of the core technologies. Line-blurring capabilities touted as part of E17, such as session management, widgets, graphical APIs, etc, are actually seperate technologies used in the demonstration applications (or part of the EFL, on top of which E17 is built).Much of what Enlightenment Project developers are doing were less than elegant (if even supported) using just the X Protocol, at least without extending it to all levels of proprietary maddness.
Is he saying that because he’s first, the Gnome camp shouldn’t imitate it?Is he saying that E17 should be adopted by the Gnome camp as their WM-of-choice? Even if they’re using similar techniques for some things, there are other fundamental things where they’re different that makes the adoption of E17 not feasible.I agree that people shouldn’t re-invent the wheel. Is rasterman saying their ideas are wrong? Apparently not since they’re the same ideas he’s already used. Which might say it’s a good practice.Seth and Havoc are referring to what they intend to do to make Gnome better. Are all similar and many have adopted least common denominators.
Cool Muse Widgets How To Do Quality
If i remote login can i run an evas app on another machine and it display locally in x and the cool stuff work… i’m going to attempt this in the near future, but have no idea about it now.If you are wanting to start from scratch and create a new desktop based on a new widget set thats geared more toward eye candy… and possibly usability, the two are not mutually exclusive of course… then E17 would definately give you a good start, and as a gui development platform i think it looks pretty nice.One thing i think gnome and kde and such can pull/learn out of englightenment is how to do quality time based animations that are smooth and perhaps the evas software composition stuff could be pulled out and used for an xrender implementation, its alot faster than current xrender soft-accell.E is a project that has taken years and years to rewrite. It would simply require either a theme engine that draws widgets using evas, or more likely a gdk backend that draws directly to evas.As far as the fullscreen window hack business mentioned earlier… what do you think nautilus is doing in order to display nice anti-aliased fonts?My only concern with all of this is weather or not the evas effects for evas apps are network transparent or not. In this case, the wheel happens to be the concepts behind rendering and not the specific implementation.Could someone tell me what the constructive part of this post is? I’d hate to think that it was just a bluster post where one person is trying to say I’m so smart without actually using those words.It wouldn’t be hard to integrate gnome apps.
There are known security problems with it, but they don’t care enough to issue to new release. It doesn’t need libast, does it? That’s got a name conflict with a much older library used by ksh93.Furthermore, Imlib2 is not well enough maintained. To that end, it’s also becoming likely that Slackware may remove other desktop environments as well in an effort to thin the herd… given that’s the path I’d like to follow with Slackware I’d say that it’s unlikely that Enlightenment will ever be shipped with Slackware again.”Also on the security of Enlightenment’s “stable” libraries such as Imlib2 (the core of E16.7 and E17)“I think that’s a real problem.
0 kommentar(er)
